tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11175154.post3042809697101765235..comments2024-03-22T05:48:26.129-05:00Comments on Braves & Birds: Assorted Peach Bowl ThoughtsMichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08365733949431139562noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11175154.post-29322324032845932272010-06-07T10:23:13.205-05:002010-06-07T10:23:13.205-05:00viagra online
buy viagra
generic viagra<a href="http://www.xlpharmacy.com/viagra/online.php" title="Viagra Online" rel="nofollow">viagra online</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.xlpharmacy.com/" title="Buy Viagra" rel="nofollow">buy viagra</a><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.xlpharmacy.com/viagra/generic.php" title="Generic Viagra" rel="nofollow">generic viagra</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11175154.post-64920291336502500202006-12-29T11:45:00.000-05:002006-12-29T11:45:00.000-05:00Hmmm... in comparing schedules, I think you're us...Hmmm... in comparing schedules, I think you're using a little slight of hand. When talking about VPI's sweak opponents, you describe the bad teams as they actually played them, but for Georgia you describe the bad teams as how you thought they'd be before the season. That's not exactly the same thing. For example, Kentucky clearly was not a gimme win. Of course, I'd also argue that neither Southern Miss nor Cincinnati is a gimme, so maybe it doesn't really matter. <br /><br />If you use the same criteria for both, the analysis of the schedules would look like this:<br /><br />Based upon how teams actually were and finished:<br />Georgia played 6 poor teams (5-1: WKU, UAB, Colorado, Ole Miss, MSU, Vanderbilt), 2 decent teams (1-1: South Carolina, Kentucky), 4 good to great teams (2-2: GT, Tennessee, Auburn, Florida)<br />Virginia Tech played 5 poor teams (5-0: Northeastern, UNC, Duke, Kent State, Virginia), 3 decent teams (3-0: Cincinnati, Southern Miss, Miami), 4 good to great teams (2-2: GT, BC, Clemson, Wake Forest). <br /><br />Now, today we'll find out whether Kentucky is better than Clemson and maybe I'll have to adjust those numbers (downgrade Clemson). Arguably, Georgia played 3 teams better than anyone on VT's schedule. VT played more middle of the road teams than Georgia. I'd probably say that comparing the two is akin to so many Pac 10-SEC slapfights. It's a question of what kind of matchups have value. Is a schedule tougher because of a few games against elite matchups (games a team will probably lose), or because of more games against teams that, while not elite, still have enough talent to cause some problems? <br /><br />As for looking at a resume based on how a team appeared before the season, well, that's pretty much useless at this point. Preseason, probably most people viewed Wake Forest as a gimme on VT's schedule, and they clearly didn't end up that way. You didn't think Colorado was a gimme for Georgia, and that team turned out terrible (though obviously the Buffaloes weren't a gimme in that specific game).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com