Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Giles for Nothing

Two years ago, I was hoping that the Braves could lock up one of Marcus Giles or Rafael Furcal for the long term because I really enjoyed having the two of them manning the middle of the infield for the Braves. Last year, I was assuming that Giles would end up leaving the Braves after the 2007 season in the same way that Furcal left after 2005: in a blossom of insane free agent dollars from a team with more money than sense like the Cubs or Dodgers. Today, Giles is gone without a peep, as the Braves declined to offer him arbitration because they didn't want to pay him roughly $5M.

First and foremost, this is another bad sign for the direction of the team under Time-Warner (and possibly Liberty Media, if they have a hand in decision making as owners-in-waiting). In December 2002 when the Braves had to offload Kevin Millwood for pennies on the dollar because they couldn't afford to keep him and Greg Maddux, I first recognized that the Braves were not operating as a big market team anymore. And so it's been for the past four years, as the club has waved goodbye to Gary Sheffield, J.D. Drew, Rafael Furcal, Javy Lopez, Greg Maddux, and Tom Glavine because, on each occasion, the team did not have the resources to compete with a bigger market team. In the past two years, the situation has gotten so dire that they lost the much-beloved Julio Franco to the Mets (and he wasn't exactly expensive), they lost Tom Glavine despite the fact that he apparently wanted to come back because they couldn't even make an offer for him, and now they've lost Marcus Giles because they couldn't fit a $5M contract into their payroll.

I've always shied away from the "corporate ownership sucks!" line of thinking, mainly because the Falcons were always the worst-run franchise in town and they were family owned for years, but it's getting hard to ignore the fact that Time-Warner is bad for the team. Either that or Braves fans are finally being punished for lukewarm attendance. Oh, and the third factor is that TBS used to be a huge asset for the Braves, but because of declining ratings and MLB jacking up the rights fees for national cable systems, it no longer provides Atlanta with a significant revenue stream.

The worst aspect of the Braves' extreme tightfistedness is that revenue is apparently exploding for the rest of baseball. Because of new revenue streams such as satellite radio and web broadcasts, as well as good deals from ESPN and Fox, teams are rolling in money right now. Furthermore, a new labor deal has made teams more confident in the long term sustainability of those revenue streams. Apparently, those factors apply to every team in baseball other than the Braves, who are now in the worst of all worlds: they are becoming more penurious as the rest of baseball is becoming more profligate. (When I get angry and have a beer, I start whipping out the $.50 words like nobody's business.) There are two possibilities here:

1. The Braves really aren't generating as much local revenue as they should as the result of declining TV ratings and lower attendance. 14 divisional titles created a sense of ennui in the fan base and Time-Warner is feeling it in the bottom line.

2. Time-Warner isn't treating the Braves as a cash cow without investing anything in them. The team could be a profitable operation, they could be creating revenues in ways that only someone with an LLM in tax law would understand, or they could be a loss leader for Time-Warner, but regardless, Time-Warner is making money from the team and isn't ploughing the money back into baseball operations. Or maybe they figure that Schuerholtz is such a magician that he doesn't need frivolous items like payroll or a second baseman to win games.

I suspect that we have a combination of both factors going on right now.

As for the baseball implications of the move, I'll start with the fact that Marcus Giles hadn't panned out like we all hoped he would after the 2003 season. That said, it's idiotic to let a pretty good second baseman go when he wasn't going to be paid that much and the free agent market is completely insane right now. If Juan Pierre (5 years, $45M), Jason Marquis (3 years, $20-28M), and Dannys Baez (3 years, $19M) are all cashing in with major deals, then what are the Braves doing letting a younger, cheaper player go with nothing coming in return? If the market is such that average to below-average players are getting major deals, then how are you letting an above-average player go? (Giles, in the worst year of his career, was 15th in the majors in OPS for second basemen.) The fact that the team is seriously considering Kelly Johnson, who, despite being the subject of my man-crush in 2005 because of his batting eye, is an outfielder coming off of Tommy John surgery, as a replacement at second base is a significant concern. And, uh, remember that Wilson Betemit guy that we gave away last year? You think he might have come in handy now? The Braves have been able to get away with substandard offensive performances from their corner outfield spots for the past two years because they get good offensive performances from defensive positions like centerfield, catcher, and the middle infield spots. In the words of Yoda, now, matters are worse.

I'm also going to point out that Giles is likely going to rebound in 2007, at least to his 2005 numbers, if not to the 2003 output that caused Baseball Prospectus to refer to him as a potential MVP down the road. Giles' on-base percentage fell last year from .365 to .341, but his walk and strikeout rates were almost the same and his dip in homers from 15 to 11 was not huge. Translation: he was unlucky on balls put in play. Some team is going to get a bargain with Giles, although the way the free agent market is going, he might go for $12M per year, in which case he isn't much of a bargain. (I kid with that last number, but who knows in this market?)


Anonymous said...

Good thoughts on Time Warner and the future of the Braves. I think you are correct when you mention that they have a lot (too much) faith in JS to put a winner on the field without spending cash.

I don't know if Giles is a great example only because they have been trying to unload him for the last several months. The interest has been minimal at best, and almost every deal was focusing on packaging him with an additional player (sounds like it was Laroche most of the time). I really believe there are a lot of people in baseball who think that Giles decline and the increase in testing for performance enhancing drugs is not a coincidence. I hate to think like that with no proof at all, but it's hard not to look at him (and his brother, which strengthens the case) and say he isn't a prime candidate for suspicion. 5'7" 175lb 2nd baseman who hits for power?

Also, it looks like there is a good logjam of Infield prospects that we are trying to make room for. The Braves are in love with Renteria so he was not an option to move.

Now the Betemit move, that was just plain awful.

Joel said...

I only got about 2/3 of the way through the post before skimming over the rest because I was getting too worked up and I have alot of work to do today. That wrote.

And does any of the blame need to fall on Schurholtz for building a team with such a top-heavy salary structure? I suppose he couldn't have known that the payroll budget would not increase for four years and I will probably continue to give him the benefit of the doubt until his days in Atlanta are over, but this offseason along with the Betemit trade have made me very weary about the future of this franchise.

Joel said...

Last sentence of first paragraph should read :

That said, I agree with everything you wrote.

My apologies

Grandy said...

I'm furious with this development allthought the steroid point is an interesting one (so to is the possibility that Giles is feeling fallout from the issue unfairly).

We gave away Betemit, which was foolish. Letting Giles walk because we won't pay 5M is absurd. I'm too upset to speak about this further right now.

Though I will point out again that for several years after the Time Warner buyout, the Braves were selling their TV rights to TBS for pennies on the dollar becuase it suited someone at Time Warner to do this (probably some sort of convuluted tax issue). It was a major blow to Braves revenue - revenue we could have been spending on playeds and player development. It's possibly now that the revenue no longer exists for the reasons you cited. But we might not have experienced such a steady decline in attendance either (tough to say, really).

I'm a Realist said...

They are banking on Willy Aybar becoming a serious contributor in the infield. Renteria is cemented at shortstop. So, where does Aybar fit in? Third? Chipper's fill-in when he has another "He injured what?" injury?

My befuddlement, if I may, comes from the "nothing" part of the "Giles for nothing." I mean, there isn't one AAA relief pitcher out there that the Braves could take a chance on? Nobody was willing to deal even a sack of BP balls or a case of beer or anything?

Anonymous said...

Bravos were in a tough spot on this one. First, there is very little demand on the open market for Gilly. He's a veteran who has passed his prime in almost all scouts eyes which means he will produce similar to a young prospect for twice (or thrice) the buck.

The Braves had no bargaining position to get even a loaf of bread for him because every GM knew he was not getting tendered. No reason to give up a prospect for a guy that will be a free agent in two weeks with little big dollar demand.

That's why every trade centered around a package deal with Roachy (who baseball people apparently really like, jury's still out if you ask me, but...)

I believe that's the way the front office had to see things. Not defending terrible TWarner, but this really was a tough spot. Who knows, maybe they'll try and re-sign him for less.

My guess is they think they can get a comparable utility guy in there this year on the cheap, with an eye towards getting one of these young bucks up and seasoned later in the year.

I always like the way he played the game, but I think his K's (108 in '04 and 105 in '05) started to outweigh his benefit.

318north said...

I agree with getting nothing. They could have gotten SOMETHING. A single-A player, at least.

Anonymous said...

韩语翻译广州同声传译上个月成交量放大广州翻译公司上海翻译公司。,德语翻译,,但这种趋势能否持续,还令深圳各界忧虑。商务口译,料就在昨日下午稍晚时间,同传设备已经说明一切。翻译是一门严谨不容践踏的语言文化。同声传译,凡购买中国移动手机充值卡深圳同声传译翻译部署促进房地产市场健康发展措施出台,深圳翻译.深圳英语翻译 ,无需制作炫丽的界面和复杂的操作功能深圳日语翻译,中国移动后台词库和网络搜索资源来获得。一时间采访的开发商、地产中介、银行 广州翻译公司,用户的体验不能停留同声传译一扫而光”,接受本报广州翻译公司,韩语翻译的今天,同声传译偶尔会和翻译公司东莞翻译公司。在线翻译工具。法语翻译同声传译设备租赁,是会议设备租赁,一项调查显示法语翻译几乎将深圳地产的阴霾情绪同声传译设备租赁,是会议设备租赁深圳手机号码网,深圳手机靓号,有的用户同传设备出租会议同传系统租赁1—11月份报告昨日公布选择在线翻译会议设备租赁乘坐和所有客户一起分享奥运来临的喜悦。新疆租车,奥运喜充天”活动更多的是通过线翻译同声传译