Here's Jonathan Wilson on the
decline of Brazil, which was on full view in their tepid performance against Mexico in the gold medal match on Saturday:
A generation has grown up watching Nike adverts showing carefree men
with questionable hair-cuts freestyling through airports, cityscapes and
prison ships and wondering how that equates to Dunga and César Sampaio,
or Edmilson and Gilberto Silva, or Zé Roberto and Gilberto Silva, or
Felipe Melo and Gilberto Silva, sitting doggedly in front of the back
four. Nike's advertising hasn't created the contradiction that lies at
the heart of Brazilian culture, but it has highlighted it, perhaps even accentuated it.
Neymar,
poor, overhyped, brilliant Neymar, is compelled to do tricks. It's not
enough that his team wins; he must also perform individual miracles and
live up to the advertisers' ideal. It is his misfortune to live in the
age of an Argentinian genius: he must also confirm to Brazilians with
every breath that he is as good, or at least may soon become as good, as
Lionel Messi. Pelé's pursuit of the line that they are equals not
merely confirms his debased status as a pundit, but is actually
counter-productive, heaping pressure on Neymar and deflecting attention
from far more significant issues.
The twin pressures on the Brazilian game have resulted in a style of
that recalls Arrigo Sacchi's description of Real Madrid in the
galacticos era: it is full of specialists. There are those who dribble
and run and shoot, and there are those who sit back and fill the spaces
to allow them to do so. It's simplistic and effective against weaker
opposition, but vulnerable to more streetwise opponents: even before beat them, had stuttered against Egypt and Honduras, before being extraordinarily fortunate against ,
who should have had two penalties in the semi-final. It also explains
why so many of Brazil's holding midfielders are tacklers and
distributors like Lucas or shuttlers like Ramires, and so few of them
deep-lying creators in the way Falcão or Gerson once were.
As
elsewhere becomes increasingly about universality, about players being
able to perform a multiplicity of roles, it also feels like an
old-fashioned style.
And here is Chris Brown on
the evolution of hybrid defenders in American football:
The 1990s Cowboys may have set the path,
but it's the current coaching innovators who are molding the idea to
the present. On offense, the trend appears to be so-called "hybrid"
offensive players, primarily the new wave of tight ends like New
England's Rob Gronkowski and Aaron Hernandez, the Saints' Jimmy Graham,
and Jermichael Finley of the Packers. All are big, tall, and fast downfield receiving threats, and those like Gronkowski can also block. Then there are the smaller "space players"
like Darren Sproles who are just as dangerous catching the ball as they
are running with it from the backfield. The meaning of the term "spread
offense" is debatable, but the principle it embodies — that all
available skill players are a potential threat on any given play, and
gone are the blocking-only fullbacks and tight ends who never touch the
ball — is now the standard at every level of football. These
multitalented and multipurpose offensive weapons are merely the latest
embodiment of that.
In response, Jimmy Johnson's edict — that speed on offense must be
matched with even more speed on offense — has been adopted by defensive
coaches at every level of football. Those hybrid offensive players are
being met with hybrid defenders.
I think I have my theme for the season in both soccer and football: the decline of specialization.
1 comment:
You're back?!
Post a Comment