Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Please Let Mark Bradley Be Right

Mark Bradley has joined John Hollinger in the ranks of respected basketball pundits who rate the Hawks' chances highly this year. He makes a good analogy to the team's emergence in the '85-'86 season, which I hope plays out this year. With the Falcons and Thrashers in the tank and Georgia and Georgia Tech headed for unremarkable seasons, this would be a good time for the Hawks to grab some headlines.

Incidentally, I'm intrigued by the lineup the Hawks deployed last night with Joe Johnson and Marvin Williams in the backcourt. Joe doesn't want to play point, but putting him there and moving Marvin to the two alleviates the logjam in the frontcourt and allows the Hawks to deploy their five best players: Johnson, Marvin, Childress, Josh Smith, and Al Horford. (I'm projecting a little on Horford, but I think he'll be the best option at the five by midseason.) If that lineup can defend against smaller, quicker guards, then it would present a lot of match-up problems for opponents. I'd much rather the Hawks' forward get minutes than their point guards.

6 comments:

Matt said...

What would you think about Childress playing point? I'd love to see it, that's for sure.

Jerry Hinnen said...

Childress played the point at various times last year since, well, no one else could and never seemed comfortable. His shooting and slashing are a bit better than his passing skills (I think, don't quote me) and I would guess he's better suited playing off the ball.

I think a better solution of solving the frontcourt logjam would have been to trade one of those forwards for an actual point guard, but you're right, Michael, when you say there's a point to getting the best five guys out there. Not completely sold that M-Williams is one of those guys yet--and I think Smith should play the 4--but we'll see.

Michael said...

I don't love Childress playing the point because he's not a threat to beat players off the dribble like JJ is. Childress moves very well without the ball and is an excellent rebounder/finisher. Those skills would be negated if he were bringing the ball up the court. He's also much more comfortable playing on the baseline. I'd bet that his shooting percentage is better from the baseline than it is from the head of the key, which is where he would be at point.

jjwalker said...

I don't know if you can go with a lineup that small *and* without great ballhandling. Starvin' (for numbers) Marvin at the 2 is intriuging, but then you have subpar ballhandling at the 1 & 2. I love Joe Johnson, but he's obviously not a true point--and if you play him there, I think you need another very good ballhandler alongside him or you run the risk of the offense stagnating.

I think that lineup is interesting and causes matchup problems, but I also think it struggles to defend small guards and big post scorers, which is a deadly combo (as anyone who's watched the infamous Smush Parker-Kwame Brown duo can tell you). Have you watched a lot of preseason--I know Horford can score, but how has he looked defensively?

Michael said...

I'm projecting that Marvin will be able to attack the basket more this year. He showed improvement at getting to the foul line in the second half of last year, which indicates that his handle is getting better. You do raise a good point that my lineup lacks sufficient dribble penetration.

I haven't seen much preseason ball; I've just been reading accounts of the games. Everyone seems pleased with Horford. He's a much better defensive rebounder than anyone else on the team. The one worrying game was against Portland, when Aldridge and Pryzbylla had their way inside with Horford and the rest of the Hawks' interior players. I ought to check to see if Al Jefferson played a lot against the Hawks earlier this week.

I'm going to the opener against the Mavs on 11/2 and will be able to report more thereafter. You have to love being a Hawks fan. I got two good tickets about ten rows up behind the basket a month before the opener against an attractive opponent for half off (through my firm).

Anonymous said...

最新的深圳市房地产北京翻译公司了。深圳翻译公司搜索巨头谷歌、俄语翻译
韩语翻译广州同声传译上个月成交量放大广州翻译公司上海翻译公司。,德语翻译,,但这种趋势能否持续,还令深圳各界忧虑。商务口译,料就在昨日下午稍晚时间,同传设备已经说明一切。翻译是一门严谨不容践踏的语言文化。同声传译,凡购买中国移动手机充值卡深圳同声传译翻译部署促进房地产市场健康发展措施出台,深圳翻译.深圳英语翻译 ,无需制作炫丽的界面和复杂的操作功能深圳日语翻译,中国移动后台词库和网络搜索资源来获得。一时间采访的开发商、地产中介、银行 广州翻译公司,用户的体验不能停留同声传译一扫而光”,接受本报广州翻译公司,韩语翻译的今天,同声传译偶尔会和翻译公司东莞翻译公司。在线翻译工具。法语翻译同声传译设备租赁,是会议设备租赁,一项调查显示法语翻译几乎将深圳地产的阴霾情绪同声传译设备租赁,是会议设备租赁深圳手机号码网,深圳手机靓号,有的用户同传设备出租会议同传系统租赁1—11月份报告昨日公布选择在线翻译会议设备租赁乘坐和所有客户一起分享奥运来临的喜悦。新疆租车,奥运喜充天”活动更多的是通过线翻译同声传译